clipped from domesticfuel.com
And that would be the amount of cellulosic ethanol required under the energy bill passed by Congress last year. “The Renewable Fuels Standard does require that we have over 21 billion gallons of renewable fuels created from biomass over the next ten years,” |
Wednesday, April 30, 2008
Biofuels GREAT for high performance cars!
Sunday, April 20, 2008
No Bigger Energy Waste
clipped from www.theage.com.au World Bank calls on oil producers to cut $50bn gas fire THE world's oil producers are wasting more than $50 billion a year of natural gas by burning it off in flares — and adding significantly to the world's greenhouse gas emissions in the process. The bank said the amount was equivalent to 27 per cent of the entire US consumption of natural gas, and 5.5 per cent of global gas output. Had it been sold in the US at 2006 prices, it would have been worth $US40 billion ($A53 billion at 2006 exchange rates). "In Africa alone, about 40 billion cubic metres of gas are burned every year, which, if put to use, could generate half the electricity needed in that continent."
|
The Case For Clean Fuel From Coal and Municpal Waste
clipped from images.google.com clipped from uk.reuters.com
clipped from uk.reuters.com
|
Saturday, April 19, 2008
Air Force Committing Lots of Land For Fuel Developers
clipped from eyeball-series.org clipped from www.flightglobal.com USAF to provide facilities for private synthetic fuel development Commercial synthetic fuel production and research into reducing the carbon dioxide output of the synthesis process could take place at the US Air Force's Malmstrom AFB in Montana under the USAF's Enhanced Use Lease programme.
|
Air Force Flies Another "Bird" on Coal
clipped from www.flightglobal.com
the USAF plans to meet half its domestic requirements with US-produced coal-to-liquid synthetic fuel by 2016. |
University Creates Fuel Technology for Commercialization
clipped from www.bizjournals.com
CleanTech Biofuels Inc. said Tuesday it entered into a licensing agreement with HFTA of Livermore, Calif., to license technology developed by scientists at the University of California-Berkeley (UCB). HFTA was formed by the UCB scientists who developed technology using nitric acid to hydrolyze biomass. University City, Mo.-based CleanTech Biofuels Inc. (OTCBB: CLTH) is a development stage company working on technologies to convert cellulosic material in municipal solid waste, green waste, and other cellulosic waste materials into fermentable sugars for the production of fuel-grade ethanol. |
Government Supports Saving Money on Biomass
clipped from www.energycurrent.com
|
Of Course We Can Have Fuel for Under $2.00
clipped from wot.motortrend.com
Developed by experts from the Coors brewery, crude oil refining, and other chemical industries, the process involves joining biomass in a fermenter with a naturally occurring microorganism (found in sources such as termites or horse manure) that unlike other methods uses all fractions of the plant, meaning the energy of all fractions of the biomass end up in the product. According to the company, their process will theoretically produce a maximum 160 gallons of ethanol for every ton of biomass, and a biomass farm with an eight-mile radius could support a refinery producing approximately 300 million gallons of the fuel per year. Well, according to ZeaChem CEO James Imber, the company will be able to produce ethanol at 80 cents per gallon at the plant, which he estimates would equal a price of about $1.50 at the pump. |
Wednesday, April 16, 2008
Major Distribution for Ethanol Blended Fuels
clipped from www.csdecisions.com
|
Tuesday, April 15, 2008
First Flight of Commerial Aircraft on Biofuel
clipped from www.youtube.com |
World Bank Weighs in on Biofuels Impact on Food
clipped from www.topnews.in Washington- Efforts by industrialized countries to reduce their dependence on foreign energy sources and cut climate-changing emissions has prompted a strong backlash from some developing nations dealing with a worsening food crisis. The problem lies in bio-fuels, an alternative source of energy that is often made from food crops. The World Bank last week said that a boost in bio-fuels production was largely to blame for an 83- per-cent increase in food prices over the last three years. Dominique Strauss-Kahn, head of the World Bank's sister-lender, the International Monetary Fund, said that many ministers expressed similar concerns to him privately over the weekend - some labelling food-to-fuel production a "crisis of humanity." Wheat, soy and palm oil prices have all been hit by increased bio- fuel production, the World Bank said. "While many are worried about filling their gas tanks, many others around the world are struggling to fill their stomachs," Zoellick said Thursday. (dpa) |
Monday, April 14, 2008
"Transport Fuel: Oil vs Coal" An Economic Look
COAL BECOMES MORE ATTRACTIVE, GIVEN HIDDEN COSTS OF IMPORTED OIL
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
CONTACT: Leo Turcotte, Ph.D., The Center Forensic Studies 800-966-6099.
John W. Rich, Jr., WMPI Pty., LLC 570-874-1602
www.ultracleanfuels.com
January 31, 2008
PHILADELPHIA, January 31, 2008 -- Coal, which the United State has in abundance, can lead the United States out of its dependence on foreign oil and act as a stimulant to the economy. It is especially attractive given the hidden costs of foreign oil.
An analysis commissioned by WMPI Pty., LLC , Gilberton, PA, and performed by the Center for Forensic Economic Studies, a Philadelphia based consulting firm, shows that when the true cost of imported oil is considered, domestically produced waste coal-to-liquid fuel (CTL) offers a compelling alternative to imported crude.
The US sits atop 270.7 billion tons of coal reserves. In terms of potential usable energy this is equivalent to at least twice the reserves of Saudi Arabia. Currently, analysts say, CTL would sell at about $18/barrel less than crude oil based liquids.
Oil reached $100 a barrel recently, but this market price does not include the societal costs of imported oil. These costs, not reflected in the price consumers pay at the pump, are borne by the economy at large in the form of higher taxes, higher unemployment and a weaker economy.
What economists call the "import premium" on imported oil includes inefficiencies due to the noncompetitive nature of the oil market. Prices set by the OPEC cartel lead to disruptive "price shocks," which unsettle the economy and interfere with national productivity. The US also pays a military cost to insure steady access to foreign oil. The Center for Forensic Economic Studies analysis places this "import premium" at $24 per barrel of imported oil, over and above market price.
In addition to the import premium, the analysis also considered the "import multiplier" -- the loss to the US economy when dollars are spent overseas. Just as every dollar spent in the US causes a beneficial ripple effect in the economy, every dollar lost to the economy by being spent overseas causes a negative ripple effect. In its analysis, the Center for Forensic Economic Studies put this negative multiplier at 1.55, or 155% of the cost of a barrel of oil. For each $80 barrel of foreign crude oil purchased, this negative import multiplier removes $124 from the U.S. economy. With the import premium and the cost to refine the imported foreign crude oil, the actual cost-per barrel of $80-per-barrel imported crude oil is $238, or $5.67 per finished gallon.
Actual cost of foreign oil:
Market Price
(per barrel) of Imported Crude Oil | Import Premium
(per barrel) | Import Multiplier
(per barrel) | Refining & Markup
(per barrel) | Total Barrel Price of Imported Oil | Actual Price per Gallon of Imported Oil |
80.00 | 24.00 | 124.00 | 10.00 | 238.00 | 5.67 |
90.00 | 24.00 | 139.50 | 10.00 | 263.50 | 6.27 |
100.00 | 24.00 | 155.00 | 10.00 | 289.00 | 6.88 |
For every dollar spent on foreign crude oil an additional $1.55 is removed from the U.S. economy. However, spending a dollar on domestic CTL stimulates the U.S. economy to the tune of six dollars by generating jobs in America for Americans. By replacing the 12 million barrels of oil imported daily with domestically produced CTL, the U.S. economy would reap a net benefit of $4.8 billion per day.
Sunday, April 13, 2008
NYC’s Hidden $4 Billion A Year Trash Treasure
An economic study of New York’s Waste-to-Fuel Potential
NYC generates enough municipal solid waste (MSW) to produce approximately one billion gallons a year of alcohol suitable for use as fuel in gasoline and diesel powered vehicles (including jet aircraft). Every gallon of this fuel directly displaces one gallon of imported fuel from outside New York City’s boroughs. Assuming an imported value of only $2.00/gallon, NYC production of fuel using its current MSW flow and modern WTF technology can displace $ 2 billion worth of fuel imports annually.
For every gallon of import fuel eliminated, NYC would have to produce a gallon locally. NYC would realize the multiplier effect of replacing imports with local production. The local economy would increase its production of transportation fuel by 1 billion gallons ($ 2 billion) triggering a host of other economic multipliers including increased employment, corporate taxes and more.
New York City pays among the highest tipping fees in the country at around $ 70/ton. Approximately half of this or $ 35/ton is spent transporting waste materials as far away as Ohio, Pennsylvania and Georgia. Saving this transportation expense alone will put $150 million/year back in the city’s coffers.
As existing landfills can be mined for their energy content (MSW would be excavated and used as fuel), the land can be returned to productive commercial or residential use. These properties could begin generating a larger tax base while eliminating the threat of water, soil and air contamination in the future. Staten Island’s Fish Kills landfill (currently closed) is the largest landfill in the world. MSW buried there will generate billions of dollars in clean fuels for generations. Its safe removal will ultimately return the land to it best and highest use.
New York needs to take advantage of its hidden trash economy now. There are at least a billion reasons to do so now.
Saturday, April 12, 2008
Friday, April 11, 2008
Clean Energy From Trash in Queens
US Liberty and Vista International to Develop Waste-to-Liquid Fuels Project in New York City
March 19, 2008 Source: Clean Edge News Vista International, Inc. recently signed a letter of intent with US. Liberty Ashes, Inc, a commercial waste hauler located in Elmont, New York, for the construction of a waste-to-liquid fuel project in the New York City metropolitan area which would deploy VVIT's gasification technology. The joint venture project is to be located in Jamaica, Queens, at a permitted transfer station currently owned and operated by Liberty. Liberty would provide the site as well as municipal solid waste, up to 1000 tons per day, as feedstock. Barry Kemble, CEO of Vista International Technologies Inc. commented, "This opportunity to showcase our gasification technology in a market such as New York City and work with a company like Liberty Ashes allows us to address serious waste disposal issues and will serve as a model for future projects in the area. It will utilize VVIT's Thermal Gasifier technology, and will demonstrate the technology's usefulness in dealing with the growing problem of overcrowded landfills."About Me
- Energy Oracle
- New York, New York, United States
- I am a consultant in the alternative fuels industry focusing on waste-to-fuel, cellulosic biomass and coal conversion technology.